Today, Mr Credit Card from www.askmrcreditcard.com is going to share with us his views on how our views on inheritance. Regular readers will know that I’m not a fan of credit cards. But if you happen to be looking for a new card, please check out his best credit cards section. Mr Credit Card has also written about other topics like identity theft protection which you may find interesting.
Inheritance is a topic very few folks talk about. This is pretty normal since most of us are concerned about reducing debt, worried about our mortgage etc. It seems that only the truly wealthy folks spend time debating this topic. But I feel that we should (when we have the time) try to think about this because I feel this will affect how you view money and how you raise your kids and even your political views on money! Joe has written a couple of post here before about inheritance and entitlement. I would like to share my views on these and hopefully expand on the topic.
The biggest issue the ultra wealthy face is how much to give their kids when they leave this world. Most have set up philanthropic foundations. But the questions of how much to give your kids is the hardest thing for most. On the one hand, you want to leave them something. Yet, leaving them too much will mostly likely result in them getting soft and lazy and losing their drive to succeed in life. Folks who have attained great wealth have done so with lots of hard work and sacrifice. They were more driven than the average person. They also know that if everything comes too easy, then you will lose motivation to work hard.
I think there are three choices you face with regards to inheritance.
Leave every thing to your kids
The first point of view is that you leave everything to your kids. All your wealth. And keep it for future generations. There are obviously many ways you can do so to have some checks and balances. The key idea to this thought is that you should endow your future generations so that they never have to worry about money. And if they do not have to worry about money, they are free to pursue their dreams and ambitions and perhaps focus their efforts on charity.
There is a downside to leaving all your inheritance to your future generations. Firstly, they lose their motivation for work. After all, if you know there is always money in the bank, you will never push that extra mile. In fact, I’ve witnessed countless times folks with inherited wealth who are just “not hungry” enough. And to be honest, you cannot blame them because they are simply reacting to their situation. The more wealth you have, the more risk adverse you will be. Look at the British aristocrats today (the dukes and earls). Have any one started a really innovative company? Has anyone of them been a successful sports person? Hardly any!
Donate most of your wealth to charity and leave enough so that your kids will never starve but will still have to work
Warren Buffet and Bill Gates belong to this camp. In fact, Bill Gates has set up his foundation (the Gates Foundation) and is heavily involved in all sorts of charity work. He said he will leave some money for his kids (enough that they will never be on the streets) but not enough such that they can goof off for the rest of their lives.
I personally would subscribe to this view as I think you kids deserve something from your efforts and at the same time, you want them to be hungry and achieve things in life.
Leave your kids with nothing
Obviously, you can choose to leave them with nothing. In fact, many folks leave their kids with nothing not out of choice, but simply because they died poor! It is not the end of the world if you kids inherit nothing from you. If you have brought them up well, they should be able to make a living for themselves.
Money shouldn’t be the only inheritance you leave
Amidst all the talk about inheritance, I think it is important to ask ourselves if money is everything when we think about inheritance. If you leave nothing for your kids, they could still be very successful. So instead of pounding our heads about how much to give, we should also focus on the following:
Teaching your kids to fish
Leaving an inheritance for your kids such that they do not have to work another day is tantamount to catching the fish for your kids and cooking it for them! They would enjoy the fish, but they would never learn how to catch or cook it. I think this is where the concept of spending time with your kids and developing a relationship with them becomes so important. Being a strong mentor to your kids perhaps is the most important thing you could teach them.
Teaching kids the value of hard work
Having three kids myself, I think teaching your kids the importance of working hard (and obviously smart) is so important.
Teaching your kids how to handle wealth
How many of us teach our kids about handling money? Not many. But I think that teaching them this skill is one of the most important legacy you can leave your kids. It means teaching them about the importance of spending less than they earn, of paying themselves first, and teaching them about the dangers of debt. That is so important because when they get to college, you can’t really stop them from applying for a college student credit card. Financial education is best taught before a child earns his money or can apply for a loan!
Once you have taught your kids to fish and cook it, then what?
Well, you have to face the three choices. You can choose not to leave them anything and leave everything to charity. Or perhaps you will not die wealthy. But if you have brought up your kids well, then they should be able to fend for themselves. Personally, if I were really wealthy, I would go with the second choice, which is to leave them enough so they would not starve but not enough that they do not have to work for the rest of their lives. I would reject the first choice of leaving everything to them (even in a trust where they cannot squander everything) because I think once we get things too easy, we lose our drive to strive for perfection. We get careless and lose our sharpness.
Things never turn out well when life gets too cushy
Just look at the welfare states in Europe. Look at Greece and their generous pension plans. Or the Spanish taking siestas in the afternoon! The Greeks are now not competitive. Have you bought anything recently “made in Greece”? Or closer to home, look at what cheap monetary policy and printing money resulted. Instead of letting recessions truly cleanse the bad business decisions, the Fed always lowers rates. Extended cheap monetary policy lulled us into a false sense of complacency. As a result, we all think that the Fed will always bail out the economy, and leverage and debt increased. Lenders make bad decisions. Even households and consumers like us made bad decisions, because there always seem to have that “safety net”. And you can’t really blame them when housing prices keep going up, when you can get zero down mortgages, cheap home equity lines of credit, 0% financing for cars and even furniture, and even do balance transfers with credit cards! Even subprime borrowers could get access to credit!
On a personal level, I’ve seen folks who have inherited lots of money not having the drive and hunger that I see in some folks. Somehow, they seem not to care so much, not willing to put in extra hours, not as concerned if things do not work out. Perhaps it’s just me, but I’ve come across too many instances to think it’s just a coincidence.
Final Thoughts
I think it is OK to leave some inheritance to your kids as a safety net (but perhaps no more). Once someone gets down the path of entitlement and having enough money to goof off, it will rub off on the future generations. And the last thing you want is to have your future generations get lazy and unproductive because of some inheritance you have left. They key term here is “safety net”. What constitute a safety net? When is enough enough? I do not know the answers. Perhaps we can leave this discussion for another day.
photo credit: quinn.anya
Please share your thoughts here.





{ 1 trackback }
{ 16 comments… read them below or add one }
It’s good to leave them some money as long as they know how to handle it responsibly. I don’t have any kids but if I did, FPU would be a requirement of getting any inheritance. It’s important kids know the value of hard work and they are not afraid of it. I think many kids today do not want to work.
This is a very timely topic. I just read that Michael Jackson’s kids are each getting $33 million, 40% at the age of 21 and the rest at 40. Perhaps he was thinking that he wanted them to make something of themselves before handing over all the dough. He is also leaving a hefty amount to charities. Perhaps that will inspire his children to do something with their lives. I can’t really relate to what it would be like, but judging from the likes of the socialites in the media, inheriting too much money isn’t necessarily a good thing!
.-= Little House´s last blog ..Tuesday Tips, Week 12 =-.
I would hope that I would instill in them all that they would need to succeed. If I gave a bunch of money to my kids after I past I would want it used for them to follow their dreams and not have money stop them.
I probably wouldn’t decide to leave all of it to them until I they grew up a little and I could see their work ethic and would for sure not tell them about their future windfall so they don’t get lazy.
.-= Kevin´s last blog ..The Best Thing you Can Do For Your Life =-.
I like that you mentioned money isn’t the only thing to leave for your kids. A legacy is so much more than cash! It’s life lessons, it’s unceasing love, it’s quality time and quantity time, it’s teaching them the truth about Christ and living that out. When they see your beliefs modeled before them, that will last a lifetime! I’ve got a 3 year old and a 1 year old and I pray that my legacy is a good one for them! Good post!
.-= Jason @ Redeeming Riches´s last blog ..Figure Your Annuity Payments With an Annuity Calculator =-.
Financial Bondage – perhaps FPU is the minimum requirement!
Little House – 40% of $33mm at the age of 21! I think that is absolutely insane. What motivation is their to work hard now? Perhaps his kids are different. But hey, give me $10mm right now and I’ll probably take a years vacation!
Jason – The majority of folks will not leave their kids with any money. So yes, teaching them about Christ, hardwork, honesty, all the good stuff becomes more important. That is the legacy we should all leave our kids.
.-= Mr Credit Card´s last blog ..Caxton FX Prepaid Global Traveller Card =-.
Expanding on the idea of leaving your kids with something…
If you pass along the tradition that the money is “for the family” you create a legacy by creating a dynasty – right?
If you help your kids pay for schooling or a home, then they continue it with their kids, and so on – aren’t you leaving a legacy (of providing) and providing at the same time?
.-= FinEngr´s last blog ..“Enough” by John Bogle – Money Section (Ch 1-3) =-.
I agree with Mr Credit Card. With $33M at age 21, what kid is going to want to work? very few…
Personally, I understand why parents don’t want to leave all their money to kids. However, there are certainly some example where I think it will work out well. Love him or hate him, I think Donald Trump has done an excellent job with Ivanka and Don Jr. He has raised poised, intelligent, and hard working kids, who will inherit hundreds of millions from his roughly $2 billion fortune. I think it is all about transferring the family values not actually dollar amounts. He values work and so does his kids (it appears).
.-= Roshawn @ Watson Inc´s last blog ..Yakezie Round Up and Uncommon Money News (Vol. 96) =-.
I love the idea of ensuring that they have the hunger and work ethic necessary to be productive members of society. I would want to provide my children with enough to fall back on in case their ambitions don’t pan out, but not too much as to kill their motivation.
.-= Khaleef @ KNS Financial´s last blog ..What to Look for When Choosing a Career – ~Choosing between money and happiness =-.
Right now, I’m leaning towards giving a portion to charity, and leaving a portion to children and family.
Leaving too much may cause them to get complacent. Leaving nothing at all seems like I didn’t provide for them.
But while they’re growing up, teaching them about work ethic and money management should set them up to be able to stand on their own two feet.
.-= Darren´s last blog ..Use Math To Alleviate Fear Of Stock Market Volatility =-.
Roshawn – I think in the case of Donald T, it is more likely his kids inherit the “business”. And since they have been taught how to run them, then yes, in this case, leaving the “family business” to them absolutely makes sense. And you are right to argue that he has taught them well (how to run the business).
.-= Mr Credit Card´s last blog ..Sun MasterCard Prepaid Card =-.
@Mr Credit Card Businesses are often the biggest assets most wealthy people have anyway. Most millionaires and billionaires obtain their wealth from their businesses. It certainly is not uncommon to want to give these assets to their offspring, provided that they can manage them responsibly. This brings me back to one’s core family values. If your kids have the same values, then they can use the inherited resources and build something even bigger and better, or at least maintain a high level of success.
.-= Roshawn @ Watson Inc´s last blog ..Yakezie Round Up and Uncommon Money News (Vol. 96) =-.
I’m with you, Mr. CC. I tell my kids not to expect an inheritance, but if they’re lucky they may get a few left over shekels after the Honeybee and I leave this Earth for a better place.
My job as a parent is to teach them to be good and decent people, and be able to support themselves and stay financially solvent.
That is the best inheritance I think I can give them.
Best,
Len
Len Penzo dot Com
.-= Len Penzo´s last blog ..Drive-By Movie Review: A Simple Plan (A Movie on the Ethics of Found Money) =-.
I’ve searched the web looking for someone who has my situation. I have two adult children and one grandchild. My son, Kurt, is 49, recently divorced with no childen. He is a nurse in the hospital where he was born. My daughter, Karen, is married and the mother of my granddaughter, Jordan. Jordan will be a senior at Baylor University next year.
My biological father died a wealthy man and left nothing to me and my sister. Thus the reason for my desire to leave Kurt and Karen some money. I’m financially able to do so and my will states my desire. However, my concern is Kurt. He gambles to the extreme – horses, internet poker, etc, etc. He actually tells me about his activities!! He knows I despise this. He never had plans – short term or long term. He has only been focused on his nursing career for the last 15 years.
Karen is just the opposite. Always the focused one. An attorney with her own lawfirm. Always the over achiever. Stable marriage. Leaving money to Karen is not a concern. But I can’t leave something to Karen and Jordan and nothing to Kurt. I just can’t. I see a lot of Kurt’s father in Kurt. That’s not a pretty picture. I have never said that to Kurt.
I worked very hard for my money and the thought of it taking a trip to Las Vegas or some other “easy” place is very hard. I’m very upset about this. I’m tired of crying about this. No one I know has this situation. Surely, I’m not the only person who is trying to come to terms with this issue.
Ruth,
Is it possible to give them some inheritance now so you can monitor how they handle it before giving more? I was thinking of the parable of the talents in Mat 25:14-46. This is not an inheritance per se, but Jesus tells a story of a man who goes on a journey and entrusts three different servants with some funds and then checks up on them later to see how they handled it.
To the ones who were wise, he gave more and to the foolish one, he took away what he had given him.
I realize this would be a difficult thing to monitor, but the concept is to give your son a reason to be responsible with his money and place any future inheritance on his shoulders. (Reward responsible money management and penalize irresponsibility).
Maybe you could talk to an estate planner about this concept and the specifics of managing it. Just a thought. Let me know how it goes.
Ruth,
Ask an estate planner if charitable trust is a good option for your situation. In doing so, you’ll get a great tax break on some of your assets, you’ll be able to give a portion to a charity when you pass, and you can name your son as a beneficiary to receive an income over time (emphasizing ‘over time’).
Proverbs 20:21
An inheritance obtained too early in life is not a blessing in the end.
Tim @ Faith and Finance´s last [type] ..Blog Stats! Faith and Finance – December 2010